A NEW RISK INDEX COMBINING -DIMER, FIBRINOGEN, HE4, AND CA199 DIFFERENTIATES SUSPECTING ENDOMETRIAL CANCER FROM PATIENTS WITH ABNORMAL VAGINAL BLEEDING OR DISCHARGE

A New Risk Index Combining -Dimer, Fibrinogen, HE4, and CA199 Differentiates Suspecting Endometrial Cancer From Patients With Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding or Discharge

A New Risk Index Combining -Dimer, Fibrinogen, HE4, and CA199 Differentiates Suspecting Endometrial Cancer From Patients With Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding or Discharge

Blog Article

Purpose: To establish an efficient new risk index for screening patients with endometrial cancer from patients with abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge.Method: A weboost splitter total of 254 patients with abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge were included in this study.Several candidate markers, including HE4, CA125, CA199, CA153, AFP, CEA, d -dimer, and fibrinogen, were employed.A new risk index for endometrial cancer screening was established by binary logistic regression.The diagnostic value of the candidate markers and the new risk index were assessed by a receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results: The most valuable diagnostic indicator for endometrial cancer was HE4, followed by d -dimer and then fibrinogen (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: HE4 = 0.794, d -dimer = 0.717, fibrinogen = 0.690).The new risk index was superior to a single application of markers and a widely used combination (HE4 and CA125).

At the ideal cutoff level, the sensitivity and specificity were 91.34% and 70.08%, respectively.In addition, only patients without organic disease served as controls, which further increase its performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.932, sensitivity = 94.

49%, and specificity = 77.42%).Conclusions: The new risk index combining HE4, d -dimer, fibrinogen, and CA199 turbo air m3f24-1-n was the ideal combination for the screening of endometrial cancer.As a simple, rapid, nondestructive detection method, the new risk index is worth promotion in clinical practice, especially in primary medical institutions.

Report this page